Related Articles:
Organic Fertilizers and N-P-K
Organic Fertilizers vs. Synthetic
Chemical Fertilizers ARE Dangerous
No matter what
we're told or how much we may try to delude ourselves, intuitively, we
all know that chemical fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides are
harmful. Why else would chemical fertilization companies be required to
put those little signs in everyones' lawns that say "STAY OFF THE GRASS" for X days after application? Why do they wear boots and gloves and masks (the smart ones anyway)? Because it isn't safe!!
So, do you think it is really safe once they remove the signs? No. It is simply safer.
The question is, how many exposures to a safer lawn will it take to
equal the toxic results of being exposed to an unsafe lawn that has one
of those little signs on it? How
many times each week do your children and pets go out and run around
and roll in the grass, rubbing those chemicals all over their body and
ingesting the dust and/or fumes?
"But,"
you say, "I don't have a fertilizer company doing my lawn. I do it
myself." Do you really think that the fertilizer you apply yourself,
that you bought at the local nursery, is any safer than the fertilizer
applied by fertilization companies? Of course it's not. Let's be real. In
fact, let's talk cold hard facts. A study done by the California Public
Interest Research Group (CALPIRG) Charitable Trust and Washingtons
Safe Food and Fertilizer tested 29 fertilizers from 12 states for 22
toxic metals. Their report "WASTE LANDS: THE THREAT OF TOXIC
FERTILIZER" documents the results of these fertilizer samples and
demonstrates that the problem of toxic fertilizers is widespread.
Their
testing showed that 29 fertilizers tested contained 22 toxic heavy
metals, many of which are known carcinogens or are considered possible
cancer causing agents. Four of these fertilizers were brand name
fertilizers marketed to unknowing consumers who generally apply these
product in even greater amounts than recommended by the manufacturer.
At least one of the fertilizers tested is a MAJOR brand used by a large
percentage of commercial lawncare and landscape companies.
Is
this really what we want our children and our pets playing on? Toxic
waste that is heavily regulated if a company chooses to try and
"dispose" of it, but is virtually unguarded if they give it to chemical
fertilizer companies as filler material?
Read the report for yourself at their website: Waste Lands: The Threat Of Toxic Fertilizer
So, Why Are You Still Applying Chemical Fertilizers?
Certainly
not because they are safer. So, why? Because they work better? Because
they are easier to apply? Because they are cheaper? Fully formulated, all natural,
organic fertilizer products will outperform chemical fertilizers every
time, especially over long term use (and many times even over the short
term). But, many are simply too expensive or too difficult to apply.
AGGRAND
is different, and I'll prove it to you. Take control of your family's
safety without breaking the bank or your back. Keep reading to find out
more (and to get the detailed natural lawncare techniques that I promised you earlier).
|
AGRO CHEMICALS!
From the beginning of human history
through the 1940's, virtually all of the agriculture on
earth was sustainable. That is to say, food was grown without
the aid of chemicals.
In the late 1940's chemical
agriculture was introduced on a wide scale and we were
led to believe that the use of chemicals would result in
better crops, increased yield and lower input costs. We
were also assured that the chemical fertilizers were
safe.
Subsequently, we found out that
chemical fertilizers were not safe, they upset the
natural balance in the soils and destroyed the natural
soil microorganisms necessary for healthy plant growth.
After using chemical fertilizers
for a few seasons, we experienced significant crop
destruction from insect invasion. Again chemicals
provided the solution in the form of a pesticide called
DDT and again we were assured that this chemical was
safe.
After using DDT for a while we
discovered that it was not safe but was in fact a
powerful cancer-causing substance. In addition, we
discovered that the insects that were not killed by the
DDT produced offspring that were immune to it.
The simple fact is, many chemicals
that are marketed as totally safe for humans are later
found to be harmful. For example, EDB (Ethylene
dibro-mide) was marketed in the 1950's as an insecticide
and a post-harvest fumigant for fruits, vegetables and
grains. In 1984, it was banned by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) due to its carcinogenicity,
mutagenicity and reproductive toxicity.
Pesticides encompass several
different chemical categories. They include herbicides
(used to kills weeds), insecticides (used to kill
insects), fungicides (used to control molds and fungi),
and rodenticides (used to kill rodents).
All
pesticides have one thing in common in common - they are
poisons designed to kill things and they have the
potential to be harmful to humans if ingested in
sufficient amounts.
The long-term disbenefits
associated with the use of agricultural chemicals, e.g.
resource depletion, environmental damage and health
consequences, are such that we need to develop and
implement ecologically sound strategies designed to
establish and maintain productive soils and prevent the
development of pests and diseases and control them in the
event of outbreaks
The Bottom Line we need to
learn from our mistakes and begin practicing sustainable
agriculture.
|
In US
farming areas, 22 percent of wells contain
nitrate levels that exceed federal safety
standards.
|
|
| |